History of Himachal Pradesh - Information
After the Mauryan Empire disintegrated, the republics in
Himachal again reorganized themselves. Some of them like Kunindas issued coins
but Audambaras and Trigarta Shashtha had been damaged beyond repair. The latter
had fragmented into parts and some of its units like Brahma-gupta had got a
separate and an independent identity (Brah-mapura) which is mentioned by Hiuen
Tsang
During Kanishka's time, Kushans, were the overlords of these
republics but as the Kushan empire weakened, Kunindas along with Yaudheyas and
Arjuneyas fought for their independence and secured it. Their hard-won freedom
however, could not last long. In about A.D. 340 the imperialist Samudragupta,
prior to his Ashwamedh Yajna, sent them a challenge to either accept his over
lordship and live in peace and prosperity or face destruction which other
kindgoms that dared to oppose him had suffered. He never had to carry his sword
to the hills which recognized his superiority.
The Gupta Empire broke up in A.D. 480-90 due to internal
dissensions and under external pressure from the Huns, whose inroads from
north-west increased towards the end of the 5th century. In A.D. 500 Tormana,
the Hun established himself as the ruler of as far-off an area as Malwa in
central India. After his death he was succeeded by Mihiragula, 'the Attila of
India', who with his implacable cruelty destroyed people and constitutions
alike. Life in north and north-west India was completely uprooted.
The Hun hordes travelled all over, devastating everything.
Mihiragula was defeated by Yashodharman, who was the Raja in central India, in
A.D. 528 and he retired to Kashmir to later become its master by deception.
Huns are often mentioned in books and inscriptions in
connection with 'Gurjaras' whose name survives in modern Gujjars. The early
Gurjaras were thus foreign elements, closely associated with and possibly
allied in blood to the white Huns.
In the wake of the Hun invasion, and in the confusion
following the defeat of Mihiragula, a number of petty states emerged in the
cis-Himalayan regions. Their chiefs were known as Rajas, Ranas and Thakurs.
They claimed them-selves to be Kshatriyas. In fact, clans or families which
succeeded in winning chieftainship were readily admitted into the frame of
Hindu polity as Kshatriyas or Rajputs. These chieftains derived their title of
Raja from Rajangas and Rana from Rajanka while the word Thakura, according to
the latest research, is a word of the Yue-che Tokhari language and was brought
by its speakers to India. Originally it denoted the Yue-Che Tokhorian tribe
which lived near the Aral Sea and which reached its zenith of power under
Kanishka. Since the Yue-Che came to hold a dominant position in India the word
Thakur or Thakkura was invested with a sense of prestige and came to mean a
chief, warrior, lord, noble, in general. From being synonymous of 'lord' or
'chief', Thakura signified a man of high caste, Kshatriya or Brahman and even
to stand for high divine power later.
North-west India was in a state of political ferment and
anarchy when Harsha in A.D. 606 came to the throne of Sthanesvara (Thanesar)
the land of Kurus which is famous as the battlefield of the Pandavas and
Kauravas. Young Harsha devoted his signal ability and energy to the
implementation of a methodical scheme of conquest with the purpose of bringing
'entire India under one umbrella.' He possessed at that stage 5,000 elephants,
20,000 cavalry and 50,000 infantry. He had discarded chariots as useless. With the
mobile and formidable force Harsha overran first the north-west and then the
entire northern India. The hill chieftains bowed to Harsha apparently without a
fight. But once the strong hand of Harsha was removed, the subdued chieftains
again assumed independence. The Rajas or Ranas held sway over their 'Rahuns'
and Thakurs over their 'Thakuris' or 'Thakurais'. Their states were small in
size and were constantly engaged in strife with one another. Their boundaries
were changed as one ruler established super einortiirtye over the other.
Numerous battles between them have found place in folklore. Excepting Kangra
and Kulu, the Himachal area was fragmented into such 'Rahuns' and `Thulkrais'.
For more information about Himachal and tours in Himachal Pradesh
contact Swantour.com.
the above write up is from the book named Hingham
ReplyDeleteHimachal Pradesh authored by Sh. Hari Krishnan Mittoo , (Director Public Relations, HP) and published by National Book Trust, India.